仲裁与诉讼有什么区别?What distinction do the arbitration and lawsuit have? 仲裁與訴訟有什麼區別?

2017/02 27 05:02

  李先生:仲裁与诉讼都是解决争议的方式,请问这两种方式的主要区别是什么?

  天津仲裁委员会工作人员:在我国仲裁与诉讼是解决争议的两个法定方式,但也有明显的区别。主要区别包括:

  (1)受案范围不同。仲裁委员会受理平等主体的公民、法人和其他组织之间的合同纠纷和财产权益纠纷。人民法院受理公民之间、法人之间、其他组织之间以及他们互相之间因财产关系和人身关系提起的民事诉讼。

  (2)管辖不同。仲裁是协议管辖,不受级别和地域的限制。民事诉讼的管辖是法定的、强制性的。

  (3)制度不同。仲裁开庭不公开进行,实行一裁终局制度。人民法院审理民事案件公开进行,实行两审终审制度。

  (4)境外执行不同。仲裁裁决根据1958年《承认和执行外国仲裁裁决公约》在世界140多个国家和地区得到承认和执行。法院判决在境外执行一般需要判决地国与执行地国签有司法协助条约或有共同确认互惠原则的才可得到执行。

  (5)仲裁员与审判员的产生方式不同。仲裁员是由仲裁委员会从社会中聘任的法律、经贸等方面的专家,是兼职人员;审判员是人民代表大会任命的国家公职人员,是专职人员。

  时报记者  刘纯

下面是陳昱潔翻译所得
Mr Li: The arbitration and lawsuit are the way that settles dispute, what is the main distinction of these two kinds of means excuse me?

Tianjin is arbitral committee staff member: Be in our country the arbitration and lawsuit are two when settle dispute legal means, but also have clear distinction. Main distinction includes:

(1) suffers case limits to differ. The contract dispute between the citizen that arbitrates committee hears equal principal part, legal person and other organization and dispute of property rights and interests. People court accepts a citizen between, between legal person, between other organization and they are mutual between the civil suit that because belongings concerns,mentions with person relation.

(2) differs administer. The arbitration is an agreement administer, do not accept the restriction of level and district. Of civil suit is legal, mandatory administer.

(3) system is different. Arbitrate sessional underground undertakes, execute dismiss end system. People court tries civil case to undertake publicly, implement system of two careful final judgment.

(Carry out outside 4) condition different. Arbitral adjudication basis 1958 ” admit and carry out a foreign country arbitral adjudication convention ” in the world 140 many countries and area get admit and be executived. Forensic court decision carries out general need to adjudicative ground country and label of executive ground state have judicatory to assist treaty or the Caikede that affirms mutually beneficial principle jointly arrives outside the condition carry out.

(The generation kind of the member that 5) arbitrates and judge is different. The member that arbitrate is the expert that waits for a respect from trade of the law of the appoint to a position in the society, classics by arbitral committee, it is pluralistic personnel; The judge is the personnel of national public office that people’s congress appoints, it is full-time personnel.

Times reporter Liu is pure
下面是黄鑫翻译所得
  李先生:仲裁與訴訟都是解決爭議的方式,請問這兩種方式的主要區別是什麼?

  天津仲裁委員會工作人員:在我國仲裁與訴訟是解決爭議的兩個法定方式,但也有明顯的區別。主要區別包括:

  (1)受案范圍不同。仲裁委員會受理平等主體的公民、法人和其他組織之間的合同糾紛和財產權益糾紛。人民法院受理公民之間、法人之間、其他組織之間以及他們互相之間因財產關系和人身關系提起的民事訴訟。

  (2)管轄不同。仲裁是協議管轄,不受級別和地域的限制。民事訴訟的管轄是法定的、強制性的。

  (3)制度不同。仲裁開庭不公開進行,實行一裁終局制度。人民法院審理民事案件公開進行,實行兩審終審制度。

  (4)境外執行不同。仲裁裁決根據1958年《承認和執行外國仲裁裁決公約》在世界140多個國傢和地區得到承認和執行。法院判決在境外執行一般需要判決地國與執行地國簽有司法協助條約或有共同確認互惠原則的才可得到執行。

  (5)仲裁員與審判員的產生方式不同。仲裁員是由仲裁委員會從社會中聘任的法律、經貿等方面的專傢,是兼職人員;審判員是人民代表大會任命的國傢公職人員,是專職人員。

  時報記者  劉純

--转载请注明: www.ks018.com,凯时娱乐-共赢共欢乐,凯时网上娱乐,凯时娱乐网址【推荐网址】 » 仲裁与诉讼有什么区别?What distinction do the arbitration and lawsuit have? 仲裁與訴訟有什麼區別?

发表回复

(必填)